IPBUF安全漏洞报告
English
CVE-2025-68223 CVSS 5.5 中危

Linux kernel drm/radeon radeon_fence_process死锁漏洞 (CVE-2025-68223)

披露日期: 2025-12-16
来源: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

漏洞信息

漏洞编号
CVE-2025-68223
漏洞类型
死锁/竞态条件
CVSS评分
5.5 中危
攻击向量
本地 (AV:L)
认证要求
低权限 (PR:L)
用户交互
无需交互 (UI:N)
影响产品
Linux kernel drm/radeon

相关标签

Linux kerneldrm/radeon死锁竞态条件本地提权CVE-2025-68223DMA-fenceGPU驱动内核漏洞中危漏洞

漏洞概述

CVE-2025-68223是Linux内核中drm/radeon驱动程序的一个中等严重性漏洞,CVSS评分5.5。该漏洞源于radeon_fence_process函数在检查fence信号状态时可能导致的自我死锁问题。在Linux内核的DMA-fence机制中,dma-fence_ops::signaled回调函数可能在fence锁状态未知的情况下被调用。对于radeon驱动,fence锁同时也是等待队列的锁,当signaled()函数尝试在等待队列上取得进展时,可能会造成自死锁。此漏洞影响本地攻击场景,需要低权限认证但无需用户交互,攻击成功可能导致系统可用性下降(高影响)。

技术细节

该漏洞的技术根源在于Linux内核的fence机制与radeon驱动锁设计的结合。dma-fence是内核用于同步GPU操作的机制,signaled回调用于检查fence是否已完成。在正常流程中,检查fence状态时应避免修改锁状态,但radeon驱动的实现中,radeon_fence_process函数会在signaled回调中被调用,该函数需要获取fence锁(也是等待队列锁)来推进等待队列。当调用链形成:signaled() -> radeon_fence_process() -> 获取同一锁 时,就会发生死锁。攻击者需要构造特定的GPU操作序列,触发fence检查路径,同时保持锁的不一致状态。本地低权限用户可通过持续提交GPU任务并监控fence状态来触发此条件,最终导致系统进程阻塞。修复方案为移除signaled回调中的队列推进逻辑,因为错误返回false(未信号)是可接受的,不会造成数据损坏。

攻击链分析

STEP 1
步骤1
攻击者获得本地系统访问权限,拥有低权限用户账户
STEP 2
步骤2
通过DRM接口(/dev/dri/cardX)与radeon驱动交互,创建GPU操作和fence对象
STEP 3
步骤3
构造特定的fence检查序列,触发dma-fence_ops::signaled回调在锁状态未知时被调用
STEP 4
步骤4
在signaled回调中调用radeon_fence_process,尝试获取已被持有的fence锁(也是等待队列锁)
STEP 5
步骤5
形成自死锁:进程持有锁并等待自己释放该锁,导致进程阻塞
STEP 6
步骤6
系统可用性受影响,可能导致相关进程挂起或系统响应变慢

PoC / 利用代码

⚠️ 仅供安全研究
以下代码仅用于安全研究和授权测试,未经授权使用属于违法行为。
PoC
// PoC for CVE-2025-68223: radeon fence deadlock // This demonstrates the deadlock condition in radeon driver // Compile: gcc -o radeon_deadlock_poc radeon_deadlock_poc.c -lpthread #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <unistd.h> /* * This is a conceptual PoC showing how the deadlock can occur. * The actual exploitation requires direct interaction with radeon DRM. * * Attack scenario: * 1. Create multiple fence objects * 2. Trigger signaled callback under specific lock conditions * 3. The radeon_fence_process will attempt to acquire the same lock * 4. Resulting in a self-deadlock */ #define MAX_THREADS 16 #define ITERATIONS 10000 void* deadlock_trigger(void* arg) { int thread_id = *(int*)arg; printf("[Thread %d] Starting deadlock trigger...\n", thread_id); /* * Simulate the fence signaling check path * In real exploitation, this would involve: * - Opening /dev/dri/cardX * - Creating GEM objects * - Submitting GPU commands that create fences * - Rapidly checking fence status */ for (int i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) { /* * The vulnerability occurs when: * 1. Fence lock is held (unknown state in signaled callback) * 2. signaled() -> radeon_fence_process() is called * 3. radeon_fence_process() tries to acquire fence lock again * 4. Deadlock occurs */ if (i % 1000 == 0) { printf("[Thread %d] Iteration %d\n", thread_id, i); } } printf("[Thread %d] Completed\n", thread_id); return NULL; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { pthread_t threads[MAX_THREADS]; int thread_ids[MAX_THREADS]; printf("CVE-2025-68223 PoC - radeon fence deadlock trigger\n"); printf("This PoC is conceptual. Real exploitation requires:\n"); printf("- Direct DRM interaction via /dev/dri/cardX\n"); printf("- GEM object creation and GPU submission\n"); printf("- Rapid fence status checking under specific timing\n\n"); /* * Create multiple threads to increase chance of triggering * the race condition that leads to deadlock */ for (int i = 0; i < MAX_THREADS; i++) { thread_ids[i] = i; if (pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, deadlock_trigger, &thread_ids[i]) != 0) { perror("pthread_create failed"); return 1; } } /* Wait for all threads */ for (int i = 0; i < MAX_THREADS; i++) { pthread_join(threads[i], NULL); } printf("PoC execution completed. Check for system hang.\n"); return 0; }

影响范围

Linux kernel drm/radeon (versions before patch commit 527ba26e50ec2ca2be9c7c82f3ad42998a75d0db)
Upstream stable versions affected: 73bc12d6a547f9571ce4393acfd73c004e2df9e5
Upstream stable versions affected: 7e3e9b3a44c23c8eac86a41308c05077d6d30f41
Upstream stable versions affected: 9d0ed508a9e2af82951ce7d834f58c139fc2bd9b
Upstream stable versions affected: 9eb00b5f5697bd56baa3222c7a1426fa15bacfb5
Upstream stable versions affected: d40a72d7e3bad4dfb311ef078f5a57362f088c7f

防御指南

临时缓解措施
由于该漏洞是内核设计问题,临时缓解措施有限。建议:(1) 限制非特权用户对DRM设备的访问权限,通过修改/dev/dri/的访问权限为仅root可访问;(2) 监控系统日志中的异常进程阻塞情况;(3) 如无必要,可考虑在BIOS中禁用独立GPU(radeon显卡)以避免使用受影响驱动。根本解决仍需等待并应用官方内核安全补丁。

参考链接

快速导航: 前沿安全 最新收录域名列表 最新威胁情报列表 最新网站排名列表 最新工具资源列表 最新CVE漏洞列表